|
[ Create New Post ]
|
|||||
|
[#91103]
Written by: boognish [03/05/08, 12:41] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
Not quite correct... In the USA, 720p is used by ABC, Fox Broadcasting Company and ESPN because the smoother image is desirable for fast-action sports telecasts, whereas 1080i is used by CBS, NBC, HBO, Showtime and Discovery HD due to the crisper picture particularly in non-moving shots. Also there's a big difference between interlaced video and progressive video. While 1080i (interlaced) has more scan lines than 720p (progressive), they do not translate directly into greater vertical resolution. Interlaced video is usually blurred vertically (filtered) to prevent twitter. Twitter is a flickering of fine horizontal lines in a scene, lines that are so fine that they only occur on a single scan line. Because only half the scan lines are drawn per field, fine horizontal lines may be missing entirely from one of the fields, causing them to flicker. Images are blurred vertically to ensure that no detail is only one scan line in height. Therefore, 1080i material does not deliver 1080 scan lines of vertical resolution. However 1080i provides a 1920-pixel horizontal resolution, greater than 720p's 1280 resolution. (sourced from wikipedia) |
|||||
|
[#91251]
Written by: death734 [04/05/08, 13:49] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
i can probably do so later tonight. yesterday i just had to much torrent activity with all the doctor who stuff EDIT: h**p://www.mininova.org/tor/1382892 Jakeness yeah the source is 1080p but for 640x352 encodes any source as good or better then 480p DVD wont yeild much of a difference on these encodes. also European HD sources own NTSC ones not because of resultion but that they are generally a higher bitrate and use the much better h264 codec rather then mpeg-2. but mean while notice how there are few HD station and shows in HD in the uk as compared to a large majority of usa stuff having an hd source |
|||||
|
[#91510]
Written by: dornedec [06/05/08, 14:15] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
|
Hi death734, Your efforts are very much appreciated by myself & I'm sure all of the guys here who would like to d/l this show but the original file size was an obstacle. You didn't have to do that in fairness... You know what's gonna happen now....don't you! LOL... Many thanks again Best Regards, |
|||||
|
[#92392]
Written by: karokat [12/05/08, 14:59] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
|
the first show was a bit disappointing, great bunch of brit actors but nothing you can do with cheesy script that drags its heels. 2nd show was more up to standard. I'll keep watching hoping it'll get better |
|||||
|
[ Create New Post ]
|
|||||