|
Please login to reply
| 1 of 1 |
|
|||||
|
[#104777]
Written by: Boxkutter [18/09/2008, 22:02] |
|||||
|
love this show. just started watching it a few months ago and i think it is hilarious. not afraid to make fun of anyone or anything. the lack of moral barometers of the five main characters is great. |
|||||
|
[#104779]
Written by: MaJie [18/09/2008, 22:13] |
|||||
| i love this show!!!!! thanks so much!!! the best sitcom since seinfeld. | |||||
|
[#104780]
Written by: drewmit [18/09/2008, 22:13] |
|||||
there was a great interview w/ the 3 creators of the show (the 3 men who aren't danny devito) on the avclub this week: http://www.avclub.com/content/interview/its_always_sunny_in  from the article, a couple of quotes seem to indicate that the characters actually do have moral barometers -- they just don't work so well: "avc: is there a limit in the show to how redeemable you can make your characters? or how outrageous you can make the action? cd: yeah. i think so. i think so. i think the limit is when it's not funny. i think it's such a gray area, that you really just have to stick to your gut with when it's funny and when it's not funny. you know, if it seems like our characters are doing malicious things with malicious intent, then maybe it's not funny. when you sort of see their twisted motivations behind it, or how they justify it in their minds, then i think you can still find the humor in it. but we'll see. as society changes, the show will change. " "avc: it's strange to see a show in which the home viewer doesn't necessarily have an active rooting interest in the people they're watching. the audience doesn't necessarily want any of you to succeed at any of your schemes, and yet we don't dislike you either. it's an odd balance to strike. gh: i think maybe on some level, it's a heightened version of rooting for the underdog, even though you know the underdog is going to fail, and even though you know they probably should. but i think you do in some way find yourself rooting for these characters, because for all the crazy, messed-up things they do, in a weird way, they're very optimistic. i think you'll notice that at the beginning of most episodes, our characters tend to have a lot of hope, and a lot of ideas on how to achieve their dreams. even though we do a lot of dark, heavy things, we usually start every episode like, "hey, i found out a way in which we can make our lives better." and then boom, we set out to do that, and the way in which we do that ends up being a little fucked-up.: |
|||||
|
[#104786]
Written by: pathomancer [18/09/2008, 22:42] |
|||||
|
these 2 eps should be nuked, 'its' is a contraction of 'it is' and spelled with an apostrophe it's. frankly i am surprised they didn't spell it i-t-z. just because the show is a celebration of stupidity is no excuse to be stoopid. i have filed an official complaint with the grammar police and expect them to act promptly. |
|||||
|
[#104788]
Written by: QSnexus [18/09/2008, 22:47] |
|||||
| so good.. oh so good. | |||||
|
[#104835]
Written by: diawol [19/09/2008, 04:48] |
|||||
|
love this show! but why are there bleeps when they say f**k? the bleeps have never been there before... i mean, the show is on the same network as rescue me! |
|||||
|
[#104842]
Written by: 012345 [19/09/2008, 06:08] |
|||||
|
..plus, why can't they just start airing it in hd!? this hilarious show certainly deserves it! |
|||||
|
[#104844]
Written by: SatanBJ [19/09/2008, 06:17] |
|||||
| 'fuck' gets sponsors mad. | |||||
|
[#104846]
Written by: JenniDark [19/09/2008, 06:50] |
|||||
it's always those fucking sponsors, eh? |
|||||
|
[#104859]
Written by: NSI [19/09/2008, 10:58] |
|||||
special characters are often dropped from file names in releases. you won't see a lot of: colons (semi- or full), quotes, apostrophes, ampersands, dollar signs, or percents. |
|||||
|
| 1 of 1 |
|
|||||
