|
[ Create New Post ]   | 1 of 1 |   |
|||||
|
[#123067]
Written by: aarias770 [18/11/09, 01:56] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
| WOW - Always worth it for the better quality - Thanks! | |||||
|
[#123077]
Written by: rusty1200 [18/11/09, 05:45] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
| avi>mkv | |||||
|
[#123079]
Written by: big_baws [18/11/09, 06:31] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
|
i am from the uk and i dont think V will be out here till next year |
|||||
|
[#123082]
Written by: lincdaddy [18/11/09, 08:07] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
|
rusty1200: Is that some kind of retarded attempt at sarcasm? I sure hope so, because anyone who believes that a 634x352 XVID AVI > a 1280x720p x264 MKV is clearly fucked in the head (or an asshat). |
|||||
|
[#123085]
Written by: carouselboy [18/11/09, 09:30] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
| thanks! | |||||
|
[#123151]
Written by: tamaricke [19/11/09, 12:08] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
| fake | |||||
|
[#123161]
Written by: Earthenergy [19/11/09, 14:54] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
| thanks | |||||
|
[#123262]
Written by: Kargor [20/11/09, 18:40] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
Actually, SOME people value filesize over quality. Plus, ancient DVD players can't play the 720p releases --- I've never seen xvid release rules, but I can imagine that using features an average (xvid-capable) player doesn't support is forbidden. Of course, if it were up to me, I would have eztv drop all the xvid/avi and instead pickup the 720p from the shows they currently don't cover in 720p. I does take a while to find stuff that eztv doesn't cover... |
|||||
|
[#123268]
Written by: rusty1200 [20/11/09, 20:55] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
|
I don't know, i find they skip a lot. and i don't find the quality is good enough to justify a gig instead of like 350 meg. but i have unlimited bandwidth so i wouldn't care if they would just play right. |
|||||
|
[ Create New Post ] | 1 of 1 | |
|||||
