|
[ Create New Post ]   | 1 of 1 |   |
|||||
|
[#153396]
Written by: CthulhuSaves [15/02/11, 20:59] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
|
Well, as long as this is objective, with no "taking sides," and shows these treasonous pukes for what they are, I'm good with it. lol |
|||||
|
[#153398]
Written by: Kief [15/02/11, 21:06] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
| Go torture some people like a good patriot. | |||||
|
[#153404]
Written by: Grinspoon [15/02/11, 21:32] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
|
The only person who committed Treason against the US is in jail. They are not and never were part of wikileaks. |
|||||
|
[#153407]
Written by: CthulhuSaves [15/02/11, 22:06] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
|
Wow, two for two! I even worded it as an apparent contradiction and added an lol, but nada. Dear Lord. ZOOOOMMMMM!!!!! Right over the noggin... |
|||||
|
[#153411]
Written by: fattywads [15/02/11, 22:49] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
|
This is a completely non-factual hit piece. There is literally nothing to see here unless you want to see every piece of speculative nay-saying about Wikileaks reaired from youtube. for instance they clam that, although no afghans were killed because of wikileaks, as confirmed by the US state department, some hae been arrested? By whom? The US's afghan allies? Thats wierd. |
|||||
|
[#153453]
Written by: omnivorous [16/02/11, 07:24] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
|
<quote>Wow, two for two! I even worded it as an apparent contradiction and added an lol, but nada. Dear Lord. ZOOOOMMMMM!!!!! Right over the noggin...<  quote>Yeah, but you have to admit it sounds a lot like any selfcontradictory troll-comment XD |
|||||
|
[#153531]
Written by: CthulhuSaves [17/02/11, 03:38] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
|
Nah, only to people who speed-read. It was a good, old-fashioned self-evidently tongue-in-cheek, sardonic statement. Trolls (who I loathe, by the by) never use humor, they try and come across as serious, thus baiting the rubes, much to their [sometimes mutual] delight. Obvious humor still occasionally gets misinterpreted, but there's nothing we can do about that short of offering a portion of our paychecks to the public school system. Subtle humor, on the other hand, can easily be taken the wrong way by those not quick on the uptake, although I absolutely love it when it's done well. (My own original "joke" was, sadly, merely obvious, and a bit ham-fisted, but it gave me a giggle nonetheless.) IMDB is a wonderful place to find real masters of subtle wit and rhetoric, amazingly enough. There's a handful of people (oddly enough, all men) who delight in finding an innocent, unsuspecting forum and starting a new thread with a maniacally devious, but oh-so-naive-and-forthright (on the surface) comment that, quite often, leads to mutiple pages of retorts before you'll finally see someone that got the joke and calls him on it. Even crazier, posters still go on with their arguing. I've often wondered if these guys are really a bunch of college professors doing research.  |
|||||
|
[ Create New Post ] | 1 of 1 | |
|||||
