|
[ Create New Post ]
|
|||||
|
[#1080]
Written by: mikey [11/10/06, 22:33] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
| is this one nuked like all of notv southparks | |||||
|
[#1099]
Written by: Xeryus [12/10/06, 04:43] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
|
There has only been one other South Park NoTV release. There was nothing wrong with it - it's just the source wasn't upto the usual release groups' standards(?). |
|||||
|
[#1101]
Written by: minchjp [12/10/06, 04:59] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
The noTV source was analogue. If you have to convert analogue to digital, let the networks do it. $10,000 machines do a better job than a $50 capture card |
|||||
|
[#1127]
Written by: Krypto [12/10/06, 15:10] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
|
see the problem is that NoTV labels his releases DSR... but in reality they are SDTV... they are not from a Digital Satellite source.. they are capped from Basic Cable which is Analog not Digital.. so technically.. ALL of their releases meet the criteria to be nuked.. the question is just whether anybody bothers to Proper them or not... |
|||||
|
[#1133]
Written by: tstrong299 [12/10/06, 16:25] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
| This NoTV reminds me of Pap. Only instead of PDTV they were SDTV or DSR. | |||||
|
[ Create New Post ]
|
|||||