|
Please login to reply
| 2 of 2 |
|
||||||
|
[#182129]
Written by: appleuser [16/04/2012, 12:03] |
||||||
|
this is nothing like 'sex and the city' or 'friends'. for those that don't know lena dunham, the writer, star and creator also created award winning indie movie tiny furniture. classy and funny. |
||||||
|
[#182138]
Written by: kinetix [16/04/2012, 16:11] |
||||||
| skins-"lite" for the twenty-something generation... lacking both the edge, vitality and wit. | ||||||
|
[#182144]
Written by: iscalio [16/04/2012, 19:37] |
||||||
"audible" would be the equivalent of "visible", not "watchable". since the latter is no actual word, brygdom's attempts at creating equally non-existing words for a radio show were correct ("listenable", as ugly a neologism it may be, comes closer to "watchable" in meaning, as "hearable" would be analogous to "seeable" ). they were also unnecessary, of course, since i am sure he knew exactly what debruehe meant. |
||||||
|
[#182149]
Written by: BoonesFerry [16/04/2012, 22:21] |
||||||
|
@ yezzmann -- thank you for being the first to research and share show info...greatly appreciated. new show information page http://eztv.it/shows/634/girls/  updated april 16, 2012  |
||||||
|
[#182150]
Written by: wrecche [16/04/2012, 23:43] |
||||||
bewbsies!!!! but sadly, given the saturation of bewbsies on the telly, it'd be like watching friends just to see jennifer anistons pokies. 20 years ago, nipples... 20 years later, unplucked chickens. |
||||||
|
[#182151]
Written by: wrecche [16/04/2012, 23:44] |
||||||
and if it ever makes it to free tv in australia, it will be shown at 11pm [in your region] cant leave out a fergism, not after you set it up so well! |
||||||
|
[#182152]
Written by: wrecche [16/04/2012, 23:46] |
||||||
well that's that then. nothing to see here. teenage girls holding sign at one direction gig at sydney tv studio, sign reads "point your erection in my direction." girls.... so naughty... |
||||||
|
[#182181]
Written by: fuzi0719 [17/04/2012, 07:41] |
||||||
|
it was painfully dreadful. i've seen better acting in a high-school production of les miz. the characters are shallow, self-absorbed, and homely wastes-of-air who haven't said or done anything worthwhile (or funny) in their miserable little lives. at least "sex and the city" had fabulous wardrobes. these girls just look nasty, as they might smell like day-old hotdog water. girls like this make me ever-grateful to be a gay man. |
||||||
|
[#182208]
Written by: neeru [17/04/2012, 15:50] |
||||||
|
the watchable-audible arguement was the only enjoyable part of this torrent. this show is horribly dreadful with a side of dreary.all they do is yap yap yap yap.. (well we should'nt have expected more from a show named "girls") |
||||||
|
[#182341]
Written by: veronica lodge [20/04/2012, 00:51] |
||||||
|
i respectfully disagree with the assessments of this show from other posters. it's got a more subtle kind of humor and the characters are not so over-the-top as on many shows, nor are they are all 'relatable' or even likeable, unlike the way that so many characters, even in dramedies, are often one-dimensional. the review that comes closest to my opinion of the show and its pilot episode is by maureen ryan writing at the huffington post which you can find here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/maureen-ryan/girls-review-lena-dunham_b_1419061.html
|
||||||
|
[#182363]
Written by: crash613 [20/04/2012, 14:01] |
||||||
|
this show is fucking horrible. after the first scene in the restaurant with the girl getting mad because parents will no longer support her,... 2 years out of college. i was like "what a fucking cunt." and that did it for me. lost total interest. i kept with it though, because i didn't like shameless at first either. but that show is awesome and has a great story. this is just filler. |
||||||
|
| 2 of 2 |
|
||||||
