Monday 28th of May 2012 17:37:36 EST
   Lost S03E03 HR HDTV AC3 5 1 XviD-NBS

Username:

Password:

Login Register
[ Forum » Episodes » Thread ]

[#1707] Written by: Dr. Doom [19/10/06, 01:45]
Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ]
I'm new - what is the actual difference between this one and the Lost S03E03
HDTV XviD-LOL torrent, besides the size?
[#1714] Written by: Keloran [19/10/06, 01:51]
Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ]
this one is in high res, noted by the HR

standard comes in (at least i shows on my screen like it) 640x480
HR comes in (at least i shows on my screen like it) 1024x768
[#1720] Written by: Dr. Doom [19/10/06, 02:03]
Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ]
Quote by Keloran
this one is in high res, noted by the HR

standard comes in (at least i shows on my screen like it) 640x480
HR comes in (at least i shows on my screen like it) 1024x768


Pwwfh - Standard is good enough for me. 690+ MB is a lot more.
[#1724] Written by: ComputeX [19/10/06, 02:07]
Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ]
Quote by Dr. Doom

Pwwfh - Standard is good enough for me. 690+ MB is a lot more.


Well worth it if you have HDTV.
[#1738] Written by: Kebab or Shag? [19/10/06, 02:56]
Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ]
Quote by Dr. Doom
Quote by Keloran
this one is in high res, noted by the HR

standard comes in (at least i shows on my screen like it) 640x480
HR comes in (at least i shows on my screen like it) 1024x768


Pwwfh - Standard is good enough for me. 690+ MB is a lot more.


Sure, if you enjoy watching SDTV but the quality of the extra 350meg is worth it
for the detail. Depends what connection you're on I suppose.
[#1741] Written by: jc [19/10/06, 02:59]
Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ]
Yeah, HR is something around 1024x768, definitely. These HR episodes are good
for collecting, better than DVD!
[#1745] Written by: Dr. Doom [19/10/06, 03:08]
Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ]
Quote by jc
Yeah, HR is something around 1024x768, definitely. These HR episodes
are good
for collecting, better than DVD!


But with the ABC watermark.
[#1750] Written by: Colossos [19/10/06, 03:25]
Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ]
I agree with the others: the HR version looks noticably better on a 32" LCD and
shows a tremendous improvement on larger screens. And if you are going to
archive them to DVD, why archive the inferior quality?
[#1752] Written by: Dr. Doom [19/10/06, 03:49]
Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ]
Quote by Colossos
I agree with the others: the HR version looks noticably better
on a 32" LCD and
shows a tremendous improvement on larger screens. And if you are going to
archive them to DVD, why archive the inferior quality?


Well I'd rather wait for the DVD.
[#1755] Written by: winofiend [19/10/06, 04:02]
Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ]
Yep Standard does me fine... I delete them after I watch them anyway, so if I
did want to keep them for the sake of keeping them, Id go out and buy the DVD
when theyre released.

Even back in the olden days of VHS, Id reuse the tape, wouldnt keep a shelf full
of tapes just for the sake of it.

Either way, kudos to all who up and who seed !!! 8]
[#1756] Written by: niki [19/10/06, 04:04]
Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ]
What is the resolution on a DVD anyway, because on my 20.1 widescreen all XviD
& DivX rips look pretty nasty at the monitor's native res of 1680 x 1050.
[#1757] Written by: Dr. Doom [19/10/06, 04:12]
Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ]
Quote by niki
What is the resolution on a DVD anyway, because on my 20.1
widescreen all XviD
& DivX rips look pretty nasty at the monitor's native res of 1680 x 1050.


XviD is DivX backwards.
[#1771] Written by: mtmra70 [19/10/06, 05:32]
Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ]
The most obvious thing for me is it is 5.1 AC3 instead of stereo.
[#1775] Written by: darolfstah [19/10/06, 05:51]
Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ]
Quote by Keloran
standard comes in (at least i shows on my screen like it) 640x480
HR comes in (at least i shows on my screen like it) 1024x768

Huh? Standard (350 MB) is 624*352 px and this HR HD release is 960*544 px.
[#1781] Written by: cubby14 [19/10/06, 06:40]
Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ]
Quote by mtmra70
The most obvious thing for me is it is 5.1 AC3 instead of
stereo.


Is it a proper 5.1 sountrack? I have never tried to figure it out because I
get a dummy 5.1 track from the smaller encodes because its stereo surround but
if it is proper 5.1, its worth the extra megs.
ipv6 ready