|
[ Create New Post ]
|
|||||
|
[#71327]
Written by: maccadog15 [08/12/07, 06:00] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
| what was wrong with the original release? | |||||
|
[#71333]
Written by: NostalgiaF [08/12/07, 06:38] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
| nfo says they fixed sync | |||||
|
[#71334]
Written by: allie181 [08/12/07, 06:39] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
| sync seemed fine to me | |||||
|
[#71336]
Written by: Statlc [08/12/07, 07:10] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
| Same here. Should of been a proper instead of a repack. | |||||
|
[#71368]
Written by: branch [08/12/07, 11:29] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
|
I just watched the previous release and didn't see anything wrong with it. The repack was pointless, in my opinion. |
|||||
|
[#71378]
Written by: aydin1954 [08/12/07, 12:01] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
could be that was causing problems on some set ups. Seen it before. |
|||||
|
[#71384]
Written by: spacej [08/12/07, 12:24] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
There are minimal sync-issues for me. I don't care much, but other people are more picky about stuff like that. |
|||||
|
[#71460]
Written by: Krypto [08/12/07, 20:15] Action: [ Reply ] [ Quote ] |
|||||
WTF?... a repack IS a proper.. it's just a proper that's released by the same original group... consider it like a group "propering" themselves. |
|||||
|
[ Create New Post ]
|
|||||